4.7 Article

Identification of Microtubule-Binding Domains on Microtubule-Associated Proteins by Major Coat Phage Display Technique

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 555-564

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm801224q

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-0709287]
  2. Department of Defense [W81XVM07-1-0572]
  3. Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology [HR06-161S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microtubule is an important structural and functional component in cells. Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) are a class of proteins that can bind to microtubules and stabilize them to maintain their functions. However, not all the specific microtubule-binding domains on MAPs are clear. Here we report the study of microtubule-binding domains on MAPs from a new angle by biopanning a new type of phage-displayed random peptide library (called landscape phage library) against purified alpha- and beta-tubulins. In the landscape phage library, billions of fd-tet phage clones are present and a unique 9-mer peptide is fused to each of the similar to 3900 copies of major coat protein (pVIII) in each clone. The affinity-selected peptides derived from the biopanning were analyzed by the receptor ligand contacts (RELIC) suite of programs, which is a bioinformatics tool for combinatorial peptide analysis and identification of protein.-ligand interaction sites. By using RELIC, the affinity-selected peptides were shown to have similarity with the sequences of two MAP families (MAPI and MAP2/tau), thereby identifying putative microtubule-binding domains on these MAPs. The tubulin-binding affinity was also confirmed by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to characterize the interaction between affinity-selected tubulin-binding phage and tubulins. Our results confirm some known microtubule-binding domains and identify some new microtubule-binding domains and thus shed light into the mechanism of microtubule-MAPs interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据