4.6 Article

Up-regulation of AT1 and AT2 receptors in postinfarcted hypertrophied myocytes and stretch-mediated apoptotic cell death

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 156, 期 5, 页码 1663-1672

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65037-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-39902, R01 HL038132, HL-43023, P01 HL043023, R01 HL039902, HL-38132] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine whether up-regulation of AT(1) and AT(2) receptors occurred in hypertrophied myocytes after infarction and whether AT(2) played a role in stretch-mediated apoptosis, left ventricular myocytes were dissociated from the surviving portion of the wall 8 days after coronary occlusion and cardiac failure in rats. Control cells were obtained from sham-operated animals. Myocytes were stretched in an equibiaxial stretch apparatus and angiotensin II (Ang II) formation and cell death were measured 3 and. 12 hours later. AT(1) and AT(2) proteins were evaluated in freshly isolated myocytes and after stretch. The effects of AT(1) and AT(2) antagonists on stretch-induced Ang II synthesis and apoptosis were also established. Myocardial infarction increased AT(1) and AT(2) in myocytes and stretch further up-regulated these receptors. Ang II levels were higher in postinfarcted myocytes and this peptide increased with the duration of stretch in both groups of cells. Similarly, apoptosis increased with time in control and postinfarcted myocytes. Absolute values of Ang II and apoptosis were greater in myocytes from infarcted hearts at 3 and 12 hours after stretch. Addition of AT(1) blocker to cultures Inhibited stretch-activated apoptosis in both myocyte populations as well as the generation of Ang II in postinfarcted myocytes. In contrast, AT(2) antagonists had no impact on these cellular events. In conclusion, Ang II stimulated cell death through AT(1) receptor activation, whereas Ligand binding to AT(2) receptor did not alter Ang II concentration and apoptosis in normal and postinfarcted hypertrophied myocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据