4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Multiple effects of retinoids on the development of Sertoli, germ, and Leydig cells of fetal and neonatal rat testis in culture

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 62, 期 5, 页码 1303-1314

出版社

SOC STUDY REPRODUCTION
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod62.5.1303

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effect of retinoids on the development of Sertoli, germ, and Leydig cells using 3-day culture of testes from fetuses 14.5 and 18,5 days post-conception (dpc) and from neonates 3 days postpartum (dpp), Addition of 10(-6) M and 3.10(-8) M retinoic acid (RA) caused a dose-dependent disruption of the seminiferous cords in 14.5-day-old fetal testes, without any change in the 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling index of the Sertoli cells. RA caused no disorganization of older testes, but it did cause hyperplasia of the Sertoli cells in 3-dpp testes. Fragmentation of the Sertoli cell DNA was not detected in control or RA-treated testes at any age studied. The cAMP produced in response to FSH was significantly decreased in RA-treated testes for all studied ages. Both 10-6 M and 3.10-8 M RA dramatically reduced the number of gonocytes per 14.5-dpc testis, This resulted from a high increase in apoptosis, which greatly exceeded the slight increase of mitosis. RA caused no change in the number of gonocytes in testes explanted on 18.5 dpc (the quiescent period), whereas it increased this number in testes explanted on 3 dpp (i.e., when gonocyte mitosis and apoptosis resume). Lastly, RA and retinol (RE) reduced both basal and acute LH-stimulated testosterone secretion by 14.5-dpc testis explants, without change in the number of 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-positive cells per testis. Retinoids had no effect on basal or LH-stimulated testosterone production by older testes. In conclusion, RE and RA are potential regulators of the development of the testis and act mainly negatively during fetal life and positively during the neonatal period on the parameters we have studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据