4.8 Article

Contribution of nitric oxide to the pathogenesis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy in bile duct-ligated rats

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 118, 期 5, 页码 937-944

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70180-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Decreased cardiac contractility and beta-adrenergic responsiveness have been observed in cirrhosis, but the etiology remains unclear. We aimed to test the role of nitric oxide (NO), a negative inotropic agent, in the pathogenesis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy in a rat model. Methods: Cirrhosis was induced by bile duct ligation. Four weeks after ligation or sham operation, cardiac levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, guanosine 3,5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP), inducible NOS (NOS2), and endothelial constitutive NOS (NOS3) messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein were determined, Serum nitrite/nitrate level was measured. Cardiac contractile function was evaluated in isolated left ventricular papillary muscles in the absence and presence of the NOS inhibitor nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Results: Cardiac TNF-alpha, NOS2 mRNA and protein, cGMP, and serum interleukin (IL)-1 beta and nitrite/nitrate levels were significantly higher in cirrhotic rats than sham controls. No significant differences in NOS3 mRNA or protein were found between cirrhotic and sham control rats. Baseline isoproterenol-stimulated papillary muscle contractile force was significantly lower in the cirrhotic group; with L-NAME incubation, contractile force increased significantly in cirrhotic rats but was unaffected in the controls. In normal papillary muscles, IL-1 beta attenuated the contractility, but coincubation with L-NAME again reversed this attenuation. Incubation with the exogenous NO donor S-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine also blunted papillary muscle contractility. Conclusions: These results suggest that cytokine-induced stimulation of NOS2 plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据