4.7 Article

Quaternary Ammonium β-Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles for Enhancing Doxorubicin Permeability across the In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 505-516

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm801026k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation
  2. National Institute of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes novel quaternary ammonium beta-cyclodextrin (QA beta CD) nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers for doxorubicin (DOX), a hydrophobic anticancer drug, across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). QA beta CD nanoparticles show 65-88 nm hydrodynamic radii with controllable cationic properties by adjusting the incorporated amount of quaternary ammonium group in their structure. ATR-FTIR studies confirm the complexation between the QA beta CD nanoparticles and DOX QA beta CD nanoparticles are not toxic to bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells (BBMVECs) at concentrations up to 500 mu g.mL(-1). They also do not change the integrity of BBMVEC monolayers, an in vitro BBB model, including transendothelial electrical resistance value, Lucifer yellow permeability, tight junction protein occludin and ZO-1 expression and morphology, cholesterol extraction, and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression and efflux activity, at a concentration of 100 mu g.mL(-1). Some QA beta CD nanoparticles not only are twice as permeable as dextran (M-w = 4000 g.mol(-1)) control, but also enhance DOX permeability across BBMVEC monolayers by 2.2 times. Confocal microscopy and flow cytometry measurements imply that the permeability of QA beta CD nanoparticles across the in vitro BBB is probably due to endocytosis. DOX/QA beta CD complexes kill U87 cells as effectively as DOX alone. However, QA beta CD nanoparticles completely protect BBMVECs from cytotoxicity of DOX at 5 and 10 mu M after 4 h incubation. The developed QA beta CD nanoparticles have great potential in safely and effectively delivering DOX and other therapeutic agents across the BBB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据