4.5 Article

Methotrexate esters of poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(2-hydroxyethyl-L-aspartamide).: Part I:: Effects of the level of methotrexate conjugation on the stability of micelles and on drug release

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 607-611

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC/PLENUM PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007529218802

关键词

methotrexate; block copolymer; polymeric conjugate; micelles; unimers; drug delivery

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI43346-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To study the effects of hydrophobicity of the micelle-funning block copolymeric drug conjugate, methotrexate /MTX) esters of poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(2-hydroxyethyl-L-aspartamide) (MTX esters of PEO-b-PHEA), on the stability of micelles and on drug release. Methods. MTX esters of PEO-b-PHEA with three levels of MTX conjugation were synthesized. Size distribution of the micelles was measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The critical micelle concentration (CMC) was determined by a light scattering study. Size exclusion high performance liquid chromatography (SEC-HPLC) was used to study the equilibrium between unimers and micelles, and release of MTX at pH 7.4. Results. MTX esters of PEO-b-PHEA with MTX substitution of 7.4%, 22%, and 54% were prepared. The conjugates formed micelles based on DLS. The stability of the micelles correlated with the level of MTX conjugation. The conjugate with 54% MTX had a lower CMC (0.019 mg/mL) than the conjugates with 22% MTX (0.081 mg/mL) or 7.4% MTX (0.14 mg/mL). Micelle dissociation was significantly slower for the conjugate with 54% MTX than that with 22% and 7.4% MTX. Slower release of MTX: from the micelles was also observed for the conjugate with the higher MTX attachment. Conclusions. MTX esters of PEO-b-PHEA can be structurally modulated by varying the degree of MTX substitution, which in turn changes the hydrophobicity of the conjugate, thereby modifying micelle stability and controlling drug release.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据