4.1 Review

The unfolded protein response at the crossroads of cellular life and death during endoplasmic reticulum stress

期刊

BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 104, 期 5, 页码 259-270

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/boc.201100055

关键词

Apoptosis; Endoplasmic reticulum; Unfolded protein response

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [09/RFP/BIC2371, 09/RFP/BMT2153]
  2. Health Research Board [HRA/2009/59]
  3. Breast Cancer Campaign [2010NovPR13, 2008NovPhD21]
  4. European FP6 Apop-Train [MRTN-CT-035624]
  5. European FP7 EC RTD Integrated Project, Apo-Sys [FP7-200767]
  6. European Euregional PACT II
  7. Belgian Interuniversity Attraction Poles [IAP 6/18]
  8. Flemish Research Foundation Flanders [FWO G.0875.11, FWO G.0973.11]
  9. Ghent University (MRP, GROUP-ID consortium)
  10. Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB)
  11. Flemish Government [BOF09/01M00709]
  12. FWO
  13. Health Research Board (HRB) [HRA-2009-59] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the early cellular responses to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). ER stress and the UPR are both implicated in numerous human diseases and pathologies. In spite of this, our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that regulate cell fate following ER stress is limited. The UPR is initiated by three ER transmembrane receptors: PKR-like ER kinase (PERK), activating transcription factor (ATF) 6 and inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1). These proteins sense the accumulation of unfolded proteins and their activation triggers specific adaptive responses to resolve the stress. Intriguingly, the very same receptors can initiate signalling pathways that lead to apoptosis when the attempts to resolve the ER stress fail. In this review, we describe the known pro-apoptotic signalling pathways emanating from activated PERK, ATF6 and IRE1 and discuss how their signalling switches from an adaptive to a pro-apoptotic response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据