4.1 Article

TI-VAMP/VAMP7 is the SNARE of secretory lysosomes contributing to ATP secretion from astrocytes

期刊

BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 104, 期 4, 页码 213-228

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/boc.201100070

关键词

Astrocytes; ATP; Cathepsin B; Secretory lysosomes; TI-VAMP/VAMP7

资金

  1. Cariplo [2008-3104]
  2. FISM [2010/R/39]
  3. Progetto CIPE/Limonte
  4. INSERM
  5. European Commission 'Signalling and Traffic' [STREP 503229]
  6. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  7. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche 'Astrex'
  8. Mairie de Paris Medical Research and Health Program
  9. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  10. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background information. ATP is the main transmitter stored and released from astrocytes under physiological and pathological conditions. Morphological and functional evidence suggest that besides secretory granules, secretory lysosomes release ATP. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in astrocytic lysosome fusion remain still unknown. Results. In the present study, we identify tetanus neurotoxin-insensitive vesicle-associated membrane protein (TI-VAMP, also called VAMP7) as the vesicular SNARE which mediates secretory lysosome exocytosis, contributing to release of both ATP and cathepsin B from glial cells. We also demonstrate that fusion of secretory lysosomes is triggered by slow and locally restricted calcium elevations, distinct from calcium spikes which induce the fusion of glutamate-containing clear vesicles. Downregulation of TI-VAMP/VAMP7 expression inhibited the fusion of ATP-storing vesicles and ATP-mediated calcium wave propagation. TI-VAMP/VAMP7 downregulation also significantly reduced secretion of cathepsin B from glioma. Conclusions. Given that sustained ATP release from glia upon injury greatly contributes to secondary brain damage and cathepsin B plays a critical role in glioma dissemination, TI-VAMP silencing can represent a novel strategy to control lysosome fusion in pathological conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据