4.2 Article

Aggregation and fusion of vesicles composed of N-palmitoyl derivatives of membrane phospholipids

期刊

LIPIDS
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 513-524

出版社

AMER OIL CHEMISTS SOC A O C S PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11745-000-551-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-Acylphosphatidylethanolamines and N-acylphosphatidylserines have been isolated from mammalian cells and have been associated with some tissue degenerative changes, although the relationship between their synthesis and the uncontrolled sequence of events that ends in irreversible tissue damage is not completely established. Our results show that monovalent and divalent cations induce aggregation and fusion of liposomes constituted by N-palmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine (NPPE) and N-palmitoylphosphatidylserine (NPPS). The effectiveness of cations to induce the aggregation of NPPE and NPPS liposomes is Ca2+ > Mg2+ much greater than Na+. NPPS liposomes aggregate at lower concentrations of divalent cations than NPPE liposomes, but with sodium NPPE liposomes aggregate to a higher extent than NPPS liposomes. The reaction order for the aggregation processes depends on the lipid and the cation nature and range from 1.04 to 1.64. Dynamic light scattering shows an irreversible increase of the size of the aggregates in the presence of all cations tested. The irreversibility of the aggregation process and the intermixing of bilayer lipids, as studied by resonance energy transfer assay, suggest that fusion, rather than aggregation, occurs. The existence of a real fusion was demonstrated by the coalescence of the aqueous contents of both NPPS and NPPE liposomes in the presence of either monovalent or divalent cations,The different binding sensitivity of Ca2+ to NPPS and NPPE liposomes, determined by zeta potential measurements, agrees with the results obtained in the aggregation and fusion assays. Our results suggest that the synthesis in vivo of N-acylated phospholipids can introduce important changes in membrane-mediated processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据