4.1 Review

The ribonome: a dominant force in co-ordinating gene expression

期刊

BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 101, 期 3, 页码 169-181

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1042/BC20080055

关键词

exosome particle; post-transcriptional operon; RNA regulon; RNA stability; translational regulation; USER code

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (KDM) [5F32NS059100]
  2. National Cancer Institute [CA94365]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R21CA094365, R33CA094365] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [F32NS059100] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ribonome is the total cellular complement of RNAs and their regulatory factors functioning dynamically in time and space within ribonucleoprotein complexes. We theorize that the ribonome is an ancient central co-ordinator that has evolved to communicate on multiple levels to the proteome on the one hand (feed-forward), and the trainscriptome and RNA processing machinery on the other (feed-back). Furthermore, the ribonome can potentially communicate to other cells horizontally with implications for biological information transfer and for the evolution of both RNA and DNA operating systems. The post-transcriptional RNA operon theory of co-regulated gene expression accounts for the co-ordinated dynamics of RNA-binding proteins within the cellular ribonome, thus allowing for the recombination and remodelling of the RNPs (ribonucleoproteins) to generate new combinations of functionally related proteins. Thus, post-transcriptional RNA operons form the core of the ribonomic operating system in which both their control and co-ordination govern outcomes. Within the ribonome, RNA-binding proteins control one another's mRNAs to keep the global mRNA environment in balance. We argue that these post-transcriptional ribonomic systems provide an information management and distribution centre for evolutionary expansion of multicellularity in tissues, organs, organisms, and their communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据