4.1 Article

Prevalence of viral genome in endomyocardial biopsies from patients with inflammatory heart muscle disease

期刊

HERZ
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 221-226

出版社

URBAN & VOGEL
DOI: 10.1007/s000590050010

关键词

chronic myocarditis; inflammatory cardiomyopathy; polymerase chain reaction; enterovirus; cytomegalovirus; adenovirus; viral infection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the report of the 1995 World Health Federation/International Society and Federation of Cardiology (WHF/ISFC) Task Force on the Definition and Classification of Cardiomyopathies, the definition of heart muscle diseases was updated. Idiopathic, autoimmune, and infectious forms of inflammatory cardiomyopathy are now recognized in this definition. Enteroviruses, adenoviruses and cytomegaloviruses are considered as main etiopathological factors in the pathogenesis of inflammatory heart disease. A wide range of different assays have been and are currently being used, either alone or in combination, to assay for the presence of enteroviral RNA and/or DNA of cytomegalo-and adenoviruses in endomyocardial biopsy and explanted heart samples. The prevalence of cardiotropic viruses in endomyocardial biopsies of patients with clinically suspected inflammatory cardiomyopathy varies widely: enteroviral genome was detected in endomyocardial biopsies of 3 to 53% of patients, cytomegaloviral DNA was detected in 3 to 40% of patients with inflammatory heart disease and adenoviruses in 3 to 23% of the patients. This report summarizes the methods that have been used and the results of molecular biological investigation with polymerase chain reaction, which were reported by several groups over the last years. Taking this together it seems to be clear that the improvement of molecular biological techniques and the experience of people working with these methods will lead to more reliable results on prevalence, persistence and the diagnostic value of these investigations. These findings have to be taken into account in future diagnostic and therapeutic studies in the field of cardiomyopathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据