4.5 Article

No involvement of endogenous nitric oxide in classical ischemic preconditioning in swine

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmcc.2000.1117

关键词

ischemic preconditioning; myocardial infarction; nitric oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endogenous nitric oxide (NO) is involved in the protection by classical ischemic preconditioning (IP) against ischemia-induced arrhythmias in anesthetized dogs. Furthermore, NO triggers and mediates protection against infarction and stunning in delayed IP in conscious rabbits. Up to now it is unclear whether or not endogenous NO is also Involved in the protection against infarction by classical IP in vivo. In 45 enflurane-anesthetized swine, severe left anterior descending coronary artery hypoperfusion for 90 min followed by 2 h of reperfusion resulted in an infarct size (IS, triphenyl tetrazolium chloride-staining) of 20.5 +/- 5.4% (S.E.M.) of the area at risk, Inhibition of NO synthase by L-nitro arginine (L-NA, 30 mg/kg i.v.) increased left ventricular (LV) peak pressure from 93 +/- 3 to 120 +/- 1 mmHg (P<0.05), but did not alter IS (22.4 +/- 5.6%). With aortic constriction to match the increase in LV peak pressure with L-NA, IS was unchanged (18.1 +/- 5.1%). IP by 10 min ischemia and 15 min reperfusion preceding the 90 min target ischemia reduced IS to 2.0 +/- 0.8% (P<0.05 v non-preconditioned groups), This reduction of IS by IP was not affected by L-NA (1.3 +/- 0.9%, P<0.05 v, non-preconditioned groups). Area at risk and myocardial blood flow (microspheres) during ischemia were not different among groups. Relationships between IS and subendocardial blood flow with L-NA or aortic constriction, respectively, were not different from that with placebo. but were significantly shifted downwards by IP with and without L-NA. Thus, endogenous NO does not alter infarct size development per se and is not involved in the protection against infarction by classical IP in pigs in vivo. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据