4.5 Article

Effects of circadian regulation and rest-activity state on spontaneous seizures in a rat model of limbic epilepsy

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 502-509

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00202.x

关键词

chronobiology; circadian rhythms; epilepsy; hypothalamus; thermoregulation; mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01-DK51562] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [K08-NS02021, NS-25605] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Circadian regulation via the suprachiasmatic nuclei and rest-activity state may influence expression of limbic seizures. Methods: Male rats (n = 14) were made epileptic by electrical stimulation of the hippocampus, causing limbic status epilepticus and subsequent seizures. We monitored seizures with intrahippocampal electrodes in 12-12-h light/dark (LD) cycles and in continuous dark (DD). We used radiotelemetry monitoring of activity to measure state and body temperature to determine circadian phase. Cosinor analysis and chi(2) tests determined whether seizures occurred rhythmically when plotted by phase. State was defined as inactive or active in 10-min epochs based on whether activity count was below or above a cut-off value validated from video observation. Results: In LD, the peak seizure occurrence was 14:59 h after circadian temperature peak (95% confidence limit, 13:37-16:19). Phasic seizure occurrence persisted in DD for 14:05 (12:31-15:38), p < 0.0001, against uniform mean distribution. In LD, 14,787 epochs contained 1,268 seizures: seizures preferentially occurred during inactive epochs (965 observed, 878 expected in proportion to the overall distribution of inactive versus active epochs: p < 0.001). In DD, 20,664 epochs contained 1,609 seizures; seizures had no preferential occurrence by state (999 observed, 1,025 expected; p = 0.16). Conclusions: Limbic seizures occurred with an endogenous circadian rhythm. Seizures preferentially struck during inactivity during entrainment to the light-dark cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据