4.5 Article

Disruption of a Spermatogenic Cell-Specific Mouse Enolase 4 (Eno4) Gene Causes Sperm Structural Defects and Male Infertility

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 88, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.107128

关键词

fibrous sheath; gene expression; glycolysis; spermatid; testis

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES070076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sperm utilize glycolysis to generate ATP required for motility, and several spermatogenic cell-specific glycolytic isozymes are associated with the fibrous sheath (FS) in the principal piece of the sperm flagellum. We used proteomics and molecular biology approaches to confirm earlier reports that a novel enolase is present in mouse sperm. We then found that a pan-enolase antibody, but not antibodies to ENO2 and ENO3, recognized a protein in the principal piece of the mouse sperm flagellum. Database analyses identified two previously uncharacterized enolase family-like candidate genes, 64306537H0Rik and Gm5506. Northern analysis indicated that 64306537H0Rik (renamed Eno4) was transcribed in testes of mice by Postnatal Day 12. To determine the role of ENO4, we generated mice using embryonic stem cells in which an Eno4 allele was disrupted by a gene trap containing a beta galactosidase (beta-gal) reporter (Eno4(+/Gt)). Expression of beta-gal occurred in the testis, and male mice homozygous for the gene trap allele (Eno4(Gt/Gt)) were infertile. Epididymal sperm numbers were 2-fold lower and sperm motility was reduced substantially inEno4(Gt/Gt) mice compared to wild-type mice. Sperm from Eno4(Gt/Gt) mice had a coiled flagellum and a disorganized FS. The Gm5506 gene encodes a protein identical to ENO1 and also is transcribed at a low level in testis. We conclude that ENO4 is required for normal assembly of the FS and provides most of the enolase activity in sperm and that Eno1 and/or Gm5506 may encode a minor portion of the enolase activity in sperm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据