4.6 Article

Increased cardiomyocyte intracellular calcium during endotoxin-induced cardiac dysfunction in guinea pigs

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 669-676

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1203/00006450-200005000-00019

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [1 R29 GM51822-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Septic shock is a complex pathophysiologic state characterized by circulatory insufficiency, multiple system organ dysfunction, and frequent mortality. Although profound cardiac dysfunction occurs during sepsis, the pathogenesis of this dysfunction remains poorly understood. To determine whether abnormalities in intramyocyte calcium accumulation might contribute to the development of cardiac dysfunction, we measured myocyte intracellular calcium during peak cardiac dysfunction after an endotoxin challenge. Intraperitoneal administration of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide 4 mg/kg to adult guinea pigs resulted in significantly impaired cardiac performance (Langendorff preparation) 18 h after challenge compared with control. This included diminished left ventricular pressure development (56 +/- 7 versus 95 +/- 4 mm Hg, p < 0.05), maximal rate of left ventricular pressure rise (998 +/- 171 versus 1784 +/- 94 mm Hg/s, p < 0.05) and left ventricular pressure fall (1014 +/- 189,versus 1621 +/- 138 mm Hg/s, p < 0.05). Assay of intracellular calcium in fura-2AM-loaded cardiac myocytes demonstrated increased intracellular calcium concentration in myocytes obtained from lipopolysaccharide-challenged animals compared with controls (234 +/- 18 versus 151 +/- 6 nM, p < 0.05). Inhibition of calcium-release channel (ryanodine receptor) opening by administration of dantrolene prevented the increase in intracytoplasmic calcium (159 +/- 8 versus 234 +/- 18 nM, p < 0.05) and partially ameliorated systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction. These data indicate that abnormalities of intracellular calcium contribute to the development of endotoxin-induced myocardial dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据