4.7 Article

The properties of supernova 1997cy associated with GRB 970514

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 534, 期 1, 页码 L57-L61

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/312653

关键词

gamma rays : bursts; supernovae : general; supernovae : individual (SN 1997cy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extraordinary SN 1997cy associated with GRB 970514 has been observed photometrically and spectroscopically for nearly 2 yr. At the time of discovery, SN 1997cy was the brightest supernova (SN) ever observed (M(V)less than or equal to -20.1, upsilon(hel) = 19,140 km s(-1), H-0 = 65 km s(-1) Mpc(-1)). Up to the last available observations (600 days after the gamma-ray burst), the total time-integrated flux was equal to or larger than that expected from the complete thermalization of the gamma-rays produced by 2.3 M-circle dot of Co-56. However, starting already on day 60 the luminosity decline is slower than the 56Co decay rate, indicating that the SN ejecta was interacting with circumstellar material (CSM). The interaction appeared to weaken around day 550. The spectra of SN 1997cy are dominated at all epochs by H alpha emission, which shows at least three components of different widths, as in SN 1988Z. Several other lines with different widths are also visible, especially at early epochs. The entire light curve of SN 1997cy is reproduced by a model of the interaction of the very energetic (E = 3 x 10(52) ergs) ejecta of a massive star (25 M-circle dot) with the CSM, with some contribution from radioactive decays. The CSM could have been ejected with a mass-loss rate of (M) over dot approximate to 4 x 10(-4) M-circle dot yr(-1) as the progenitor star evolved from a blue to a red supergiant about 10(4) yr before the explosion. The lack of oxygen and magnesium lines in the spectra at nebular phases poses a problem for models requiring high-mass progenitors. The possibility that most of the core material of the progenitor has fallen onto a massive black hole so that the reverse shock dies at the inner edge of the H/He envelope is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据