4.3 Article

Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: Relation to preoperative and intraoperative parameters

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 727-732

出版社

AMER SOC CATARACT REFRACTIVE SURGERY
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00462-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the location of the corneoscleral tunnel incision as well as preoperative and intraoperative parameters on total and localized endothelial cell. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Methods: Fifty consecutive patients scheduled for routine cataract surgery were selected prospectively for this clinical trial. Preoperatively, the axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and astigmatism were measured. Phacoemulsification time and relative energy as well as total surgical time were recorded. With a specular microscope, endothelial cell counts were determined centrally, superiorly, and temporally preoperatively and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: After 12 months, the mean overall central endothelial cell loss in all eyes was 8.5%. The mean endothelial cell loss was 11.9% in the lateral quadrant and 11.4% in the superior quadrant. There were no significant differences between superior and temporal surgical approaches in intraoperative parameters of phacoemulsification time, relative intensity of phacoemulsification, and surgical time. There were no significant differences in central endothelial cell loss or in the area localized in the quadrant of the positions of the corneal site. The only risk factors found significant for higher endothelial cell loss were shorter axial length and longer phacoemulsification time. Conclusions: The location of corneoscleral incisions for phacoemulsification can be chosen according to the preoperative astigmatism without inducing additional adverse effects on the corneal endothelium. Shorter eyes have a significantly higher risk for greater endothelial cell loss. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:727-732 (C) 2000 ASCRS and ESCRS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据