4.7 Review

Nuclear genes resolve Mesozoic-aged divergences in the insect order Lepidoptera

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 242-259

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0746

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compared to the number of genes available for study of both younger and older divergences, few genes have yet been identified that can strongly resolve phylogenetic splits of Mesozoic age (similar to 65-250 mya). Thus, reconstruction of Mesozoic-age phylogenies, exemplified by basal divergences within the major orders of holometabolous insects, is likely to be especially dependent on combining multiple lines of evidence. This study tests the potential of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene for reconstructing Mesozoic-aged divergences within the insect order Lepidoptera and its ability when combined with a second, previously analyzed nuclear gene (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, PEPCK) to strongly resolve these relationships. 18S sequences were obtained for 21 taxa, representing major clades of Lepidoptera plus outgroups from the other panorpoid orders. A well-corroborated morphology-based test phylogeny was used to evaluate the effects of partitioning the 18S gene according to variable versus conserved domains, paired versus unpaired sites in the secondary structure, and transition versus transversion substitutions. Likelihood and unweighted parsimony analyses of the 18S data recover the test phylogeny almost completely, with no improvement of agreement or support provided by any form of weighting or partitioning. No conflict in signal between 18S and PEPCK was detected by the partition homogeneity test. Combined parsimony analysis yielded strong bootstrap support for nearly all relationships, much higher than for either gene alone, thereby also providing strong evidence on several hypotheses about the early evolution of lepidopteran-plant interactions. These genes in combination may be widely useful for resolving insect divergences of comparable age. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据