4.5 Article

Reliability of fatty acid composition in human serum phospholipids

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 367-372

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600964

关键词

fatty acids; phospholipids; reliability; serum

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA13343, CA16087, CA34588] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We examined the reliability of the fatty acid composition of serum phospholipids in the New York University Women's Health Study, a prospective study of sex hormones, diet and breast cancer. Design: Non-fasting serum samples collected at three yearly visits, in 46 healthy women, and stored at -80 degrees C for 7-12 y, were included in the study. Serum phospholipid fatty acid composition was measured by capillary gas chromatography. Results: For the 20 individual fatty acids measured, the reliability coefficients were less than 0.50 for four, between 0.50 and 0.70 for nine, and greater than 0.70 for seven. Among the major fatty acids, arachidonic and alpha-linolenic acids had high reliability coefficients (0.71 and 0.72, respectively), palmitic, oleic, linoleic, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids had intermediate coefficients (0.57, 0.69, 0.62, 0.64 and 0.66, respectively), whereas stearic acid had the lowest coefficient (0.15). The reliability coefficients for total monounsaturated fats, omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids were moderately high (0.66, 0.53 and 0.66, respectively), whereas the coefficients for total saturated fats and total polyunsaturated fats were low (0.31 and 0.43, respectively). Conclusions: These results indicate that the fatty acid composition of serum phospholipids can be a useful tool in epidemiologic studies, although for most fatty acids a single determination is associated with some error in measurement that should be taken into account at the design and analysis stages. Storage for up to 12 y at -80 degrees C preserved polyunsaturated fatty acids from oxidation very well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据