4.7 Article

Chronic pancreatitis:: Evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function with MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 215, 期 2, 页码 358-364

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMER
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma10358

关键词

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); pancreas, function; pancreas, MR; pancreatitis; secretin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To compare duodenal filling seen at magnetic resonance (MR) pancreatography after secretin stimulation and biochemical parameters determined with the intraductal secretin test (IDST) for evaluation of pancreatic exocrine function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation and IDST were performed in 41 patients with chronic pancreatitis (group 1) and eight patients with other pancreatic disease (group 2). A control group (group 3, n = 28) underwent MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation only. MR pancreatograms were acquired before and every 30 seconds for 10 minutes after secretin injection. Duodenal filling was graded from least amount of filling (grade 1) to normal filling (grade 3) on the last MR pancreatogram. Pancreatic exocrine function was determined at IDST, Main pancreatic ductal diameter was compared between groups 1 and 3. RESULTS: All ductal diameters were significantly larger in group 1 (P < .001). The maximal diameter variation after secretin stimulation was significantly higher in the control group (P = .001). pancreatic exocrine function parameters determined at IDST were significantly lower in patients with grade 1 duodenal filling than in those with grade 2 or 3 (P < .05). Maximal bicarbonate concentration alone was independently associated with all grades of duodenal filling (P = .007). The sensitivity and specificity of reduced duodenal filling for assessment of reduced pancreatic exocrine function were 72% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Duodenal filling grade determined at MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation allows specific estimation of pancreatic exocrine function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据