4.6 Article

Endothelial heme oxygenase-1 induction by hypoxia -: Modulation by inducible nitric-oxide synthase and S-nitrosothiols

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 18, 页码 13613-13620

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13613

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stress protein heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is induced in endothelial cells exposed to nitric oxide (NO)releasing agents, and this process is finely modulated by thiols (Foresti, R,, Clark, J, E,, Green, C, J,, and Motterlini Il, (1997) J. Biol, Chem, 272, 18411-18417), Here, we report that up-regulation of HO-1 in aortic endothelial cells by severe hypoxic conditions (pO(2) less than or equal to 2 mm Hg) is preceded by increased inducible NO synthase and NO synthase activity. This effect is accompanied by oxidation of intracellular glutathione and formation of S-nitrosothiols, Incubation of cells with a selective inhibitor of inducible NO synthase (S-(2-aminoethyl)-isothiourea) or a NO scavenger ([2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide]) significantly attenuated the increase in heme oxygenase activity caused by reduced oxygen availability. A series of antioxidant agents did not prevent the elevation in heme oxygenase activity by hypoxia; however, the precursor of glutathione synthesis and thiol donor, N-acetylcysteine, completely abolished HO-1 induction. We also found that the hypoxia-mediated increase in endothelial heme oxygenase activity was potentiated by the presence of S-nitrosoglutathione. These results indicate that intracellular interaction of thiols with NO is an important determinant in the mechanism leading to HO-1 induction by reduced oxygen levels. We suggest that in addition to oxidative stress, HO-1 gene expression can be regulated by redox reactions involving NO and S-nitrosothiols (nitrosative stress), emphasizing a versatile role for the heme oxygenase pathway in the cellular adaptation to a variety of stressful conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据