4.7 Article

Upper mantle seismic wave velocity: Effects of realistic partial melt geometries

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 105, 期 B5, 页码 10975-10986

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2000JB900041

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate seismic wave velocity reduction resulting from the presence of partial melt in the upper mantle. The amount; of shear and bulk modulus reduction produced by the presence of a connected network of realistically shaped and naturally organized melt inclusions is found using finite element calculations. The geometries of the inclusions are taken directly from laboratory experiments of mantle melting, with finite element meshes constructed to conform to these shapes. The shear and bulk moduli of the composite material are found for both the unrelaxed (isolated inclusions) and relaxed (pressure equalized inclusions) cases by assigning appropriate material properties to the fluid, Modulus reduction from deformation simulations of a solid containing realistically shaped and ellipse-shaped melt inclusions quantify the effect of melt pocket cuspateness and melt pocket organization on seismic velocity reduction. The three-dimensional response is estimated from two-dimensional distributions of the melt phase by determining the mode II and mode III components of elastic modulus reduction separately and summing their effects. In general, cuspate and naturally organized melt inclusions cause greater velocity reduction. It is shown that V-P and V-S reduction per percent partial melt are at least 3.6% and 7.9%, respectively. Even higher values for velocity reduction are possible above 1% melt fraction if melt exists only in tubules below 1% melt fraction. The lower, more conservative values of velocity reduction are similar to 70% greater for V-P and 84% greater for V-S than the analytically determined values for ellipsoidal inclusions. Somewhat greater effects are possible if nonrandom organization of melt occurs on scales greater than our model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据