3.8 Article

Developmental changes in mitochondrial activity and energy metabolism in fetal and neonatal rat brain

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 121, 期 1, 页码 67-72

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-3806(00)00025-0

关键词

fetus; neonate; brain; mitochondria; developmental change

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments were undertaken to investigate mitochondrial activity and energy metabolism in the developing rat brain from the late fetal stage to the neonatal stage. Samples of cerebral cortical tissue were obtained from fetuses at 14, 16, 18, and 20 days of gestation, and from pups at 1 h, 1 day and 7 days after birth. Mitochondrial respiration was measured polarographically using homogenates. Fetal and neonatal brains were frozen in situ and fluorometric enzymatic techniques were used for the analysis of ATP, ADP, AMP, and lactate. In the fetal brain, there was a gradual increase in stimulated (+ADP) and uncoupled respiratory rates using glutamate and malate as substrates, from 14 days to 20 days of gestation, together with a moderate increase in ATP concentration and in the sum total of adenine nucleotides, and a significant decrease in lactate. Since non-stimulated (-ADP) respiratory rates did not change with increasing gestational age, the respiratory control ratio appeared to increase over the same period. An increase in mitochondrial activity was more pronounced immediately after birth, together with a marked increase in ATP concentration and in the sum total of adenine nucleotides. The highest rate of mitochondrial respiration was observed in 1-hour-old pups. These results indicate that, in the rat brain, there is maturation of oxidative metabolism in mitochondria that is initiated in lace gestation. Acceleration in mitochondrial respiration occurs immediately after birth in order to maintain high-energy phosphate levels, and this may be crucial for the successful outcome of the newborn. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science BN. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据