4.7 Article

Identification of differentially expressed genes in cardiac hypertrophy by analysis of expressed sequence tags

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 1-14

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/geno.2000.6171

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiac hypertrophy is an adaptive response to chronic hemodynamic overload. We employed a whole-genome approach using expressed sequence tags (ESTs) to characterize gene transcription and identify new genes overexpressed in cardiac hypertrophy. Analysis of general transcription patterns revealed a proportional increase in transcripts related to cell/organism defense and a decrease in transcripts related to cell structure and motility in hypertrophic hearts compared to normal hearts. Detailed comparison of individual gene expression identified 64 genes potentially overexpressed in hypertrophy, of 232 candidate genes derived from a set of 77,692 cardiac ESTs, including 47,856 ESTs generated in our laboratory. Of these, 29 were good candidates (P < 0.0002) and 35 were weaker candidates (P < 0.005). RT-PCR of a number of these candidate genes demonstrated correspondence of EST-based predictions of gene expression with irt vitro levels. Consistent with an organ under various stresses, up to one-half of the good candidates predicted to exhibit differential expression were genes potentially involved in stress response. Analyses of general transcription patterns and of single-gene expression levels were also suggestive of increased protein synthesis in the hypertrophic myocardium, Overall, these results depict a scenario compatible with current understanding of cardiac hypertrophy. However, the identification of several genes not previously known to exhibit increased expression in cardiac hypertrophy (e.g., prostaglandin D synthases; CD59 antigen) also suggests a number of new avenues for further investigation. These data demonstrate the utility of genome-based resources for investigating questions of cardiovascular biology and medicine. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据