4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Recent terrestrial and carbonate fluxes in the pelagic eastern Mediterranean; a comparison between sediment trap and surface sediment

期刊

PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY
卷 158, 期 3-4, 页码 197-213

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00050-X

关键词

aluminium; calcium; east Mediterranean; flux; recent; sediment traps; surface sediment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sediment trap mooring was deployed in the central eastern Mediterranean from November 1991 to August 1994. At 3000 m water depth, total mass, Al, Ca, Mg, Sr and Th-230 fluxes recovered by the sediment trap are highly seasonal, with highest fluxes during early spring in 1992 and 1993, and during late-spring/early-summer in 1994. Comparison of historic annual satellite-derived chlorophyll records (coastal zone colour scanner) with the trap flux time series indicates a lag of 4-6 months between maximum primary production in the surface ocean and maximum flux recorded by the trap. Only the flux of coccospheres to the trap is at a maximum similar to 1 month after maximum pigment concentrations in surface waters, a value commonly found in other areas. Quantification of the inorganic (lithogenic) flux to the trap indicates that Saharan dust is likely to be the major contributor to the trap mass flux, The trapping efficiency of the sediment trap, as calculated from the intercepted Th-230 flux, is only 23%, and the trap Al-flux is similarly x4 lower than Al fluxes measured in nearby uppermost sediments. Compared with surface sediments, the trap-intercepted carbonate fluxes are even lower (x9) than the corresponding lithogenic fluxes. This is partly due to the very low abundance of large (>32 mu m) foraminifera and pteropods found in the trap material compared to the surface sediment. We speculate that the period of our sediment trap deployment was insufficiently long to recover episodical large fluxes, such as may be triggered by North Atlantic Oscillation variations. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据