4.4 Article

Modulation of the activities of catalase-peroxidase HPI of Escherichia coli by site-directed mutagenesis

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 39, 期 19, 页码 5868-5875

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0000059

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalase-peroxidases have a predominant catalatic activity but differ from monofunctional catalases in exhibiting a substantial peroxidatic reaction which has been implicated in the activation of the antitubercular drug isoniazid in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Hydroperoxidase I of Escherichia coli encoded by katG is a catalase-peroxidase, and residues in its putative active site have been the target of a site directed-mutagenesis study. Variants of residues R102 and H106, on the distal side of the heme, and H267, the proximal side ligand, were constructed, all of which substantially reduced the catalatic activity and, to a lesser extent, the peroxidatic activity. In addition, the heme content of the variants was reduced relative to the wild-type enzyme. The relative ease of heme loss from I-IPI and a mixture of tetrameric enzymes with 2, 3, and 4 hemes was revealed by mass spectrometry analysis. Conversion of W105 to either an aromatic (F) or aliphatic (I) residue caused a 4-5-fold increase in peroxidatic activity, coupled with a >99% inhibition of catalatic activity. The peroxidatic-to-catalatic ratio of the W105F variant was increased 2800-fold such that compound I could be identified by both electronic and EPR spectroscopy as being similar to the porphyrin cation radical formed in other catalases and peroxidases, Compound I, when generated by a single addition of H2O2, decayed back to the native or resting stale within 1 min. When H2O2 was generated enzymatically in situ at low levels, active compound I was evident for up to 2 h. However, such prolonged treatment resulted in conversion of compound I to a reversibly inactivated and, eventually, to an irreversibly inactivated species, both of which were spectrally similar to compound I.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据