4.8 Article

The role of pre- and post-anaphase microtubules in the cytokinesis phase of the cell cycle

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 611-614

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00490-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. PHS HHS [24364] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytokinesis phase, or C phase, of the cell cycle results in the separation of one cell into two daughter cells after the completion of mitosis. Although it is known that microtubules are required for proper positioning of the cytokinetic furrow [1,2], the role of pre-anaphase microtubules in cytokinesis has not been clearly defined for three key reasons. First, inducing microtubule depolymerization or stabilization before the onset of anaphase blocks entry into anaphase and cytokinesis via the spindle checkpoint [3]. Second, microtubule organization changes rapidly at anaphase onset as the mitotic kinase, Cdc2-cyclin B, is inactivated [4]. Third, the time between the onset of anaphase and the Initiation of cytokinesis is very short, making it difficult to unambiguously alter microtubule polymer levels before cytokinesis, but after inactivation of the spindle checkpoint. Here, we have taken advantage of the discovery that microinjection of antibodies to the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 (mitotic arrest deficient) in prometaphase abrogates the spindle checkpoint, producing premature chromosome separation, segregation, and normal cytokinesis [5,6]. To test the role of pre-anaphase microtubules in cytokinesis, microtubules were disassembled in prophase and prometaphase cells, the cells were then injected with anti-Mad2 antibodies and recorded through C phase. The results show that exit from mitosis in the absence of microtubules triggered a 50 minute period of cortical contractility that was independent of microtubules. Furthermore, upon microtubule reassembly during this contractile C-phase period, similar to 30% of the cells underwent chromosome poleward movement, formed a midzone microtubule complex, and completed cytokinesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据