4.6 Article

120-and 160-kDa receptors for endogenous mitogenic peptide, phytosulfokine-α, in rice plasma membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 20, 页码 15520-15525

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.20.15520

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant cells in culture secrete a sulfated peptide named phytosulfokine-alpha (PSK-alpha), and this peptide induces the cell division and/or cell, differentiation by means of specific high and low affinity receptors, Putative receptor proteins for this autocrine type growth factor were identified by photoaffinity labeling of plasma membrane fractions derived from rice suspension cells. Incubation of membranes with a photoactivable I-125-labeled PSK-alpha analog, [N-epsilon-(4-azidosalicyl)Lys(5)]PSR-alpha (ASPSK-alpha), followed by UV irradiation resulted in specific labeling of 120- and 160-kDa bands in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, The labeling of both bands was completely inhibited by unlabeled PSK-ru and partially decreased by PSK-alpha analogs possessing moderate binding activities. In contrast, PSR-cu analogs that have no biological activity showed no competition for I-125-AS-PSK-alpha binding, confirming the specificity of binding proteins. Analysis of the affinity of I-125 incorporation into the protein by ligand saturation experiments gave apparent K-d values of 5.0 nM for the 120-kDa band and 5.4 nM for the 160-kDa band, suggesting that both proteins correspond to the high affinity binding site. Treatment of I-125-AS-PSK-or cross-linked proteins with peptide N-glycosidase F demonstrated that both proteins contained approximately 10 kDa of N-linked oligosaccharides, Specific cross-linking of I-125-AS-PSK-alpha was also observed by using plasma membranes derived from carrot and tobacco cells, indicating the widespread occurrence of the binding proteins. Together, these data suggest that the 120- and 160-kDa proteins are PSK-cu receptors that mediate the biological activities of PSK-alpha.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据