4.8 Article

Altered pain responses in mice lacking α1E subunit of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.100124197

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

alpha(1) subunit of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel is essential for channel function and determines the functional specificity of various channel types. alpha(1E) subunit was originally identified as a neuron-specific one, but the physiological function of the Ca2+ channel containing this subunit (alpha(1E) Ca2+ channel) was not clear compared with other types of Ca2+ channels because of the limited availability of specific blockers. To clarify the physiological roles of the alpha(1E) Ca2+ channel, we have generated alpha(1E) mutant (alpha(1E)-/-) mice by gene targeting. The lacZ gene was inserted in-frame and used as a marker for alpha(1E) subunit expression, alpha(1E)-/- mice showed reduced spontaneous locomotor activities and signs of timidness, but other general behaviors were apparently normal. As involvement of ale in pain transmission was suggested by localization analyses with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta-D-galactopyranoside staining, we conducted several pain-related behavioral tests using the mutant mice. Although alpha(1E)+/- and alpha(1E)-/- mice exhibited normal pain behaviors against acute mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli, they both showed reduced responses to somatic inflammatory pain. alpha(1E)+/- mice showed reduced response to visceral inflammatory pain, whereas alpha(1E)-/- mice showed apparently normal response compared with that of wild-type mice. Furthermore, alpha(1E)-/- mice that had been presensitized with a visceral noxious conditioning stimulus showed increased responses to a somatic inflammatory pain, in marked contrast with the wild-type mice in which long-lasting effects of descending antinociceptive pathway were predominant. These results suggest that the alpha(1E) Ca2+ channel controls pain behaviors by both spinal and supraspinal mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据