4.7 Article

Siesta and the risk of coronary heart disease: results from a population-based, case-control study in Costa Rica

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 429-437

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/29.3.429

关键词

physical activity; exercise; coronary heart disease; sleep; Latin America; Hispanic; trigger

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 49086] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The siesta (afternoon nap or rest), a common traditional behaviour in tropical areas, may increase the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) since the post siesta cardiovascular response very closely resembles the period soon after waking up in the morning when the onset of acute cardiovascular events is high. Methods We studied 505 MI survivors and 522 randomly selected controls, matched for age, gender, and area of residence, in a population-based case-control study in Costa Pica. Participation rates were 97% for cases and 90% for controls. All subjects completed a physical activity questionnaire that included occupational and leisure time components with specific questions on siesta. Five siesta frequency categories (<1/wk, 1-4/wk, 5-6/wk, daily [greater than or equal to 1 h and <2 h], and daily [greater than or equal to 2 h and <3:30 h]) were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) by multiple logistic regression. Results Compared to controls, cases were more likely to take daily siestas (44 versus 35%, P = 0.01), and spend more time per siesta (1:07 +/- 0:04 versus 0:54 +/- 0:04 h:min, P = 0.002). As compared to subjects with the lowest siesta frequency (<1/wk), the OR for MI among those in the highest category was 1.51 (95% CI : 1.02-2.25, P for trend = 0.006). After adjusting for risk factors, lifestyle, and health history the OR across the siesta categories were 1.0, 0.77, 1.28. 1.66, and 1.40 (P for trend = 0.02). Conclusions Our data suggest that the practice of daily siesta is associated with increased risk of MI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据