4.6 Article

Fresh porcine cardiac valves are not rejected in primates

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
卷 119, 期 6, 页码 1216-1220

出版社

MOSBY-YEAR BOOK INC
DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2000.106526

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P51RR00168-37] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [1F32HL0996601] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Transplanted porcine hearts are hyperacutely rejected by human immunoglobulin M antibodies against a porcine vascular endothelial molecule, galactose alpha-1,3-galactose, with ensuing human complement activation and membrane attack complex deposition. It is unclear, however, whether porcine valve endothelium triggers a similar immune response. We sought to investigate whether fresh porcine valves implanted into primates are rejected. Methods: Wild-type porcine hearts before (n = 6) and after (n = 3) heterotopic transplantation into baboons underwent sectioning and were examined by hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry for galactose alpha-1,3-galactose, primate immunoglobulin M, and membrane attack complex. Results: Examination of untransplanted porcine hearts showed that although cardiac microvascular endothelium strongly expressed the galactose alpha-1,3-galactose antigen, galactose alpha-1,3-galactose was not detected on the endothelium of porcine aortic and pulmonary valves. Porcine hearts transplanted into baboon recipients were hyperacutely rejected 60 to 80 minutes after implantation. Despite dramatic tissue damage associated with extensive immunoglobulin M and membrane attack complex binding on the microvascular endothelium, the aortic and pulmonary valves were entirely spared. Valves remained morphologically intact at explant and showed no signs of immunoglobulin M- and membrane attack complex-mediated damage. Conclusions: The absence of galactose alpha-1,3-galactose expression may protect unfixed porcine valves from xenograft rejection in primates. Further investigation of viable porcine valves appears warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据