4.3 Article

Variation of perioperative plasma mitochondrial DNA correlate with peak inflammatory cytokines caused by cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-015-0298-6

关键词

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Mitochondrial DNA; Inflammatory cytokine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81170288]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgroud: Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may cause inflammatory responses, which can deteriorate the outcomes. Inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6,-8 and -10, can act as both the effector and the predictor for post-operative inflammatory responses. Plasma mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was found as a pro-inflammatory agent recently, which was released when cells were insulted. Methods: In the present study, we included 38 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) to analyze their perioperative plasma mtDNA and levels of inflammatory cytokines. Blood samples were collected before aortic cross-clamping (T1), at the end of CPB (T2), 6 h post-CPB (T3), 12 h post-CPB (T4), and 24 h post-CPB (T5). Rt-PCR and specific ELISA kits were used to quantify the plasma mtDNA and inflammatory cytokines, respectively. Bivariate correlations analysis was used to check the correlations between plasma mtDNA and inflammatory cytokines respectively. Results: Results shown that plasma mtDNA elevated significantly at T2 and peaked at T4. Furthermore, plasma TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-8 levels significantly increased at T2 and peaked at T3 while IL-10 elevated and peaked at T2. Bivariate correlations analysis showed that the peak plasma mtDNA were positively correlated with the peak TNF-alpha (r = 0.677, P < 0.001), the peak IL-6 (r = 0.706, P < 0.001), the peak IL-8 (r = 0.584, P < 0.001) and the peak IL-10 (r = 0.565, P < 0.001). Conclusion: We found that plasma mtDNA might play a key role in CPB-induced post-operative inflammatory responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据