4.6 Article

Ischemia-induced interleukin-6 as a potential endogenous neuroprotective cytokine against NMDA receptor-mediated excitoxicity in the brain

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1097/00004647-200006000-00008

关键词

interleukin-6; focal cerebral ischemia; neuroprotection; excitotoxicity; primary cortical neuronal culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the brain, the expression of the pleiotropic cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) is enhanced in various chronic or acute central nervous system disorders. However, the significance of IL-6 production in such neuropathologic states remains controversial. The present study investigated the role of IL-6 after cerebral ischemia. First, the authors showed that focal cerebral ischemia in rats early up-regulated the expression of IL-6 mRNA without affecting the transcription of its receptors (IL-6R alpha and gp130). Similarly, the striatal injection of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) in rats, a paradigm of excitotoxic injury, activated the expression of IL-6 mRNA. The involvement of glutamatergic receptor activation was further investigated by incubating cortical neurons with NMDA or alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate (AMPA). NMDA and ionomycin (a calcium ionophore) up-regulated IL-6 mRNA, suggesting that neurons may produce IL-G in response to the calcium influx mediated through NMDA receptors. The potential role of IL-6 Juring ischemic/excitotoxic insults was then studied by testing the effect of IL-6 against apoptotic or excitotoxic challenges in cortical cultures. IL-6 did not prevent serum deprivation- or staurosporine-induced apoptotic neuronal death, or AMPA/kainate-mcdiated excitotoxicity. However, in both mixed and pure neuronal cultures, IL-6 dose-dependently protected neurons against NMDA toxicity. This effect was blocked by a competitive inhibitor of IL-6. Overall, the results suggest that the up-regulation of IL-6 induced by cerebral ischemia could represent an endogenous neuroprotective mechanism against NMDA receptor-mediated injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据