4.7 Article

Angiotensin-(1-7) reduces norepinephrine release through a nitric oxide mechanism in rat hypothalamus

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 1248-1252

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.35.6.1248

关键词

angiotensin; norepinephrine; nitric oxide; angiotensin antagonist; bradykinin; prostaglandins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiotensin (Ang)-(1-7) elicits a facilitatory presynaptic effect on peripheral noradrenergic neurotransmission, and because biological responses to the heptapeptide on occasion are tissue specific, the present investigation was undertaken to study its action on noradrenergic neurotransmission at the central level, In rat hypothalamus labeled with [H-3]-norepinephrine, 100 to 600 nmol/L Ang-(1-7) diminished norepinephrine released by 25 mmol/L KCl. This effect was blocked by the selective angiotensin type 2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 (1 mu mol/L) and by the specific Ang-(1-7) receptor antagonist [D-Ala(7)]Ang-(1-7) (1 mu mol/L) but not by losartan (10 nmol/L to 1 mu mol/L), a selective angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist. The inhibitory effect on noradrenergic neurotransmission caused by Ang-(1-7) was prevented by 10 mu mol/L N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methylester, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase activity, and was restored by 100 mu mol/L L-arginine, precursor of nitric oxide synthesis. Methylene blue (10 mu mol/L), an inhibitor of guanylate cyclase considered as the target of nitric oxide action, as well as Hoe 140 (10 mu mol/L), a bradykinin B-2-receptor antagonist, prevented the inhibitory effect of the heptapeptide on neuronal norepinephrine release, whereas no modification was observed in the presence of 0.1 to 10 mu mol/L indomethacin, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. Our results indicate that Ang-(1-7) has a tissue-specific neuromodulatory effect on noradrenergic neurotransmission, being inhibitory at the central nervous system by a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism that involves angiotensin type 2 receptors and local bradykinin production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据