4.8 Article

Inactivation of bacteria, virus and Cryptosporidium by a point-of-use device using pulsed broad spectrum white light

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 9, 页码 2491-2498

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00014-2

关键词

point-of-use device; DAPI; excystation; cell culture; cryptosporidium; infectivity; inactivation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are currently numerous point-of-use (POU) devices on the market claiming to inactivate micro-organisms including Cryptosporidium. In order to protect public health it is important that these devices be evaluated using the most sensitive and specific methodology available. A point-of-use device trade marked PureBright(R) that utilizes pulsed light was characterized using the United States Environmental Protection Agency Guide Standard and Protocol for Testing Microbiological Water Purifiers. The unit was challenged with Klebsiella terrigena, polio virus type 1 strain Lsc2ab, simian rotavirus SA11 and Cryptosporidium parvum. The unit was tested over 8 days which included two 48-h stagnation periods. The PureBright unit was run at the manufacturer's recommended flow rate of 15.14 l/min (4 gal/min). Each microbial challenge consisted of 75.71 of influent water containing 10(5) CFU:ml of Klebsiella, 10(4) PFU/ml of polio and rotavirus and 10(4) oocysts/ml of Cryptosporidium. Influent and effluent samples were collected and assayed using standard methods for the detection of viable bacteria (membrane filtration) and viruses (cell culture). Viable Cryptosporidium oocysts were determined using vital dyes, excystation, cell culture and animal infectivity. The PureBright unit was able to achieve a > 7 log(10) inactivation of Klebsiella, a > 4 log(10) inactivation of polio and rotavirus and a > 4 log(10) inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum using relatively good quality influent water. Cell culture and animal infectivity analysis were shown to be equivalent in determining C. parvum viability. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据