4.6 Article

Lung overexpression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene induces pulmonary edema

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/ajrcmb.22.6.3779

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL57318, HL51854] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [K08-03089] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We hypothesized that the angiogenic mediator, vascular endothelial growth factor (VECF), known to be expressed in the lung and to be capable of inducing local edema in skin, might evoke the development of lung edema if expressed in excess amounts. To test this hypothesis, we developed an in vivo model of VECF overexpression in the lung on the basis of delivery to the respiratory epithelium of the VECF165 complementary DNA by an E1(-) adenovirus vector (AdVEGF165). Administration of AdVECF165 by the intratracheal route (10(9) plaque-forming units [pfu]) to C57BI/6 mice showed increased expression of VEGF messenger RNA in lung tissue by Northern analysis. Overexpression of VEGF protein in the lung at Days 1 to 10 was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Intratracheal administration of AdVEGF165 resulted in a dose-dependent increase in lung wet/dry weight ratios over time, lung histology showed widespread intraalveolar edema, and pulmonary capillary permeability was significantly increased as quantified by the Evans blue dye assay and [I-131]albumin permeability. To confirm the specificity of these observations, mice were pretreated with intranasal administration of an adenovirus vector expressing a truncated soluble form of the VEGF receptor flt-1 (Adsflt), Adsflt (109 pfu) pretreatment completely abrogated the increased lung wet/dry weight ratio caused by AdVEGF165 administration, whereas an identical adenovirus vector with an irrelevant transgene had no effect upon subsequent AdVEGF165-induced pulmonary edema. Together, these data suggest that overexpression of VEGF in the lung may be one mechanism of increased pulmonary vascular permeability in the early stages of acute lung injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据