4.5 Article

Microinjections of dopaminergic agents in the nucleus accumbens affect ethanol consumption but not palatabillty

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 307-312

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00182-9

关键词

dopamine; nucleus accumbens; d-amphetamine; raclopride; taste reactivity; ethanol consumption; rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It was determined whether ethanol palatability in rats could be changed by manipulating the reinforcement experienced during limited access consumption. During the first 3 days of the experiment, initial taste reactivity (TR) testing to distilled water (1 day) and 10% alcohol (2 days) was performed. Following the establishment of baseline TR, separate groups of animals received bilateral microinjections (0.5 mu l/side) into the nucleus accumbens of either the nonspecific dopamine agonist d-amphetamine sulfate (20 mu g, n = 10), the D-2 antagonist raclopride (1.0 mu g, n = 8), or physiological saline (n = 5). The injections occurred at the same time each day for 5 consecutive days. Five minutes after the microinjection, the fluid-deprived rats were given 30-min access to 10% ethanol. Over the 3 days following drug administration, TR to distilled water and 10% alcohol was repeated. After this, the rats were once again given 30 min of access to 10% ethanol for 5 consecutive days, but without drug microinjection prior to alcohol access. A final TR exposure (the same as the others) was performed over the final 3 days of the study. Both raclopride and d-amphetamine administration produced reductions in ethanol consumption tin comparison to saline treatment). However, treatment with d-amphetamine and raclopride during ethanol consumption did not cause significant, conditioned changes in palatability as measured by the taste reactivity procedure. These results suggest that dopamine plays a role in the motivation to consume ethanol but this neurotransmitter is not involved in evaluating its incentive value. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据