4.7 Article

The infrared Einstein ring in the gravitational lens MG J1131+0456 and the death of the dusty lens hypothesis

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 535, 期 2, 页码 692-705

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/308852

关键词

dust, extinction; galaxies : individual (MG J1131+0456); galaxies : photometry; gravitational lensing; infrared : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have obtained and modeled NICMOS images of the Einstein ring lens system MG J1131 + 0456, which show that its lens galaxy is an H = 18.6 mag, transparent, early-type galaxy at a redshift of z(l) similar or equal to 0.84; it has a major axis effective radius R-e = 0.7 +/- 0.1, projected axis ratio b/a = 0.6 +/- 0.1, and major axis P.A. = 55 degrees +/- 9 degrees. The lens is the brightest member of a group of at least seven galaxies with similar R-I and I-H colors, and the two closest group members produce sufficient tidal perturbations to explain the shape of the ring. The host galaxy of the MG J1131 + 0456 source is a z(s) greater than or similar to 2 extremely red object (ERO) that is lensed into optical and infrared rings of dramatically different morphologies. These differences imply a strongly wavelength-dependent source morphology that could be explained by embedding the host in a larger, dusty disk. At 1.6 mu m (H), the ring is spectacularly luminous, with a total observed flux of H = 17.4 mag and a demagnified flux of 19.3 mag, corresponding to a 1-2 L-* galaxy at the probable source redshift of z(s) greater than or similar to 2. Thus, it is primarily the stellar emission of the radio source host galaxy that produces the overall colors of two of the reddest radio lenses, MG J1131 + 0456 and JVAS B1938 + 666, aided by the suppression of optical active galactic nucleus emission by dust in the source galaxy. The dusty lens hypothesis - that many massive early-type galaxies with 0 less than or similar to z(l) less than or similar to 1 have large, uniform dust opacities - is ruled out.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据