4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Duodenopancreatic resections in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 231, 期 6, 页码 909-916

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200006000-00016

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000036, M01RR00036] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To review the authors' 7-year experience with a surgical approach for pancreatic and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) designed to remove all gross tumor with limited complications, preserving pancreatic function. Summary Background Data MEN 1 is an autosomal dominant familial neoplasia syndrome characterized by the development of NETs of the duodenum and pancreas. Some tumors are clinically insignificant or follow a benign course, although a subset pursues a malignant, lethal natural history, the risk of surgical management must be appropriate to the disease course. Methods The clinical, biochemical, genetic, and pathologic data were retrospectively reviewed for 21 consecutive MEN 1 patients undergoing pancreatic resection for NETs between 1993 and 1999 at one institution. Age at operation, presenting symptoms, results of preoperative and intraoperative localization studies, major and minor complications, and pathology, including metastases, were analyzed. Results The surgical approach was selected based on the location and size of the tumors. Five patients required pancreaticoduodenectomy, 11 patients underwent non-Whipple pancreatic resections, and 5 underwent simple enucleation of benign NETs. The incidence of regional lymph node metastases was 33%. Conclusions Major pancreatic procedures can be performed safely in most patients with MEN 1 and NETs. Because NETs are the most common MEN I-related cause of death in the authors' kindreds, an aggressive surgical approach, including early intervention before malignant spread and major pancreatic resection where indicated, appears justified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据