4.7 Article

A sensitive electrochemical aptasensor based on palladium nanoparticles decorated graphene-molybdenum disulfide flower-like nanocomposites and enzymatic signal amplification

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 853, 期 -, 页码 234-241

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.003

关键词

Aptasensor; Graphene-molybdenum disulfide; Electrochemical response; Signal amplification; Thrombin

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of China [708073]
  2. NNSF of China [21075100, 21275119]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing City [CSTC-2011BA7003, CSTC-2010BB4121]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2014A012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, with the aggregated advantages of graphene and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), we prepared poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)-graphene/molybdenum disulfide (PDDA-G-MoS2) nanocomposites with flower-like structure, large surface area and excellent conductivity. Furthermore, an advanced sandwich-type electrochemical assay for sensitive detection of thrombin (TB) was fabricated using palladium nanoparticles decorated PDDA-G-MoS2 (PdNPs/PDDA-G-MoS2) as nanocarriers, which were functionalized by hemin/G-quadruplex, glucose oxidase (GOD), and toluidine blue (Tb) as redox probes. The signal amplification strategy was achieved as follows: Firstly, the immobilized GOD could effectively catalyze the oxidation of glucose to gluconolactone, coupling with the reduction of the dissolved oxygen to H2O2. Then, both PdNPs and hemin/G-quadruplex acting as hydrogen peroxide (HRP)-mimicking enzyme could further catalyze the reduction of H2O2, resulting in significant electrochemical signal amplification. So the proposed aptasensor showed high sensitivity with a wide dynamic linear range of 0.0001 to 40 nM and a relatively low detection limit of 0.062 pM for TB determination. The strategy showed huge potential of application in protein detection and disease diagnosis. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据