4.6 Article

Hormone replacement therapy for oxidative stress in postmenopausal women with hot flushes

期刊

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 804-809

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00822-X

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the association of hot flushes during postmenopause with oxidative stress and to determine whether hormone replacement therapy (HRT) affects the plasma redox status of postmenopausal women. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical study of 49 postmenopausal women who have (n = 29) or do not have (n = 20) hot flushes. Twelve of the postmenopausal women with hot flushes and six without were treated with HRT (estradiol patches and medroxyprogesterone acetate) for 4 months. Plasma level of estradiol, total antioxidant status, reduced sulfhydryl groups, lipoperoxides, total cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured at 4-month intervals in both groups, before and after treatment. Results: postmenopausal women who have hot flushes, had lower total basal antioxidant status in plasma (.9 +/- .01 compared with 1.14 +/- .01 mmol/L), lower concentration of reduced sulfhydryl groups (145 +/- 4 compared with 200 +/- 3 mu mol/L), and higher concentration of lipoperoxides (2.88 +/- .04 compared with 2.61 +/- .04 mu mol/L) than women without hot flushes. After HRT, total antioxidant status and reduced sulfhydryl groups increased, and lipoperoxides decreased similarly in both groups. Hormone replacement therapy decreased the frequency of hot flushes per day from 11.2 +/- 0.8 to 1.4 +/- 0.3. Conclusion: Hot flushes in postmenopausal women were associated with the oxidative process. Hormone replacement therapy decreases oxidative stress and the number of episodes of hot flushes. Because oxidative stress is associated with a high risk for cardiovascular diseases, HRT might protect women with hot flushes. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;95: 804-9. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据