4.6 Article

A new Silurian palaeolatitude for eastern Avalonia and evidence for crustal rotations in the Avalonian margin of southwestern Ireland

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 141, 期 3, 页码 661-671

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00101.x

关键词

apparent polar wander; Avalonia; continental deformation; palaeogeography; palaeomagnetism; Silurian

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Palaeomagnetic data are presented from Mid-Silurian (Homerian, Upper Wenlock, similar to 425 Ma) sediments from the Dingle Peninsula, SW Ireland, which forms part of the northern margin of the Palaeozoic microcontinent of Avalonia. Three remanence components were recognized. After removal of a low-temperature component ('L'), oriented parallel to the present Earth field at the sampling area, two higher-stability components were isolated: an intermediate-unblocking-temperature component ('I') with mean in situ D = 196.9 degrees, I = 11.0 degrees, alpha 95 = 10.8, with a corresponding palaeopole at 330.0 degrees E, 30.6 degrees S (dp = 5.6, dm = 11.0), and a high-unblocking-temperature component ('H') with mean tilt-corrected D = 218.6 degrees, I = 22.1 degrees, alpha 95 = 7.9, with a corresponding palaeopole at 309.5 degrees E, 18.3 degrees S (dp = 4.4, dm = 8.4). A primary (Wenlock) age is indicated for the 'H'-component by a positive intraformational conglomerate test, whereas the 'I'-component is thought to be a secondary mid-Carboniferous partial remagnetization. These data confirm that the sector of the Iapetus Ocean between Avalonia and Laurentia was essentially closed, within the limits of palaeomagnetic resolution, by the Wenlock. There is still, however, a discrepancy between the declinations recorded by similar-aged sequences to the north and south of the Iapetus Suture. These point to either an approximately 30 degrees clockwise rotation of the entire Avalonian microcontinent relative to Laurentia during closure, or local vertical axis rotations of the sampling sites in southern Britain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据