4.7 Article

Plasma nitrite/nitrate concentrations as a tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 296, 期 1-2, 页码 181-191

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-8981(00)00260-6

关键词

alpha-fetoprotein; hepatocellular carcinoma; nitric oxide; nitrite/nitrate; tumor marker

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since plasma concentrations of nitrite/nitrate, the stable end-products of nitric oxide, increase in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) correlatively to tumor volume, we examined the ability of plasma nitrite/nitrate to discriminate between those patients with HCC and those without and compared the diagnostic performance of the parameter with that of serum ol-fetoprotein (AFP) concentrations. Plasma nitrite/nitrate and serum AFP concentrations were measured using a Griess reaction and a solid phase enzyme immunoassay, respectively. Eighty-nine patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD) with (n = 39) or without HCC (n = 50) and 50 healthy control subjects participated in the study. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off value and accuracy. The areas under ROC curves for nitrite/nitrate and AFP were calculated to be 0.758 and 0.812, respectively, which were not significantly different. There was no correlation between the concentrations of plasma nitrite/nitrate and serum AFP. The sensitivity, the specificity, and diagnostic efficiency were 79.5, 72.0, and 75.3%, respectively, for nitrite/nitrate, and 74.4, 76.0, and 75.3%, respectively, for AFP. Based on a partial ROC curve, the clinical utility of plasma nitrite/nitrate as a tumor marker approximated that of serum AFP, but exceeded in AFP-negative patients. Indeed, nitrite/nitrate was positive in 70% of AFP-negative HCC patients. The simultaneous determinations of serum AFP and plasma nitrite/nitrate concentrations gave significant improvement in detection of HCC in CLD patients compared with that of serum AFP alone. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据