4.2 Article

Comparison of Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation and HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation for Adults with Leukemia

期刊

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 780-787

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.10.008

关键词

Unrelated cord blood transplantation; HLA-mismatched unrelated bone marrow transplantation

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare [H17-014, H20-015, H19-1, H23-010]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21591239, 23791077] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and high-resolution typing of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) from an unrelated donor have increased choices in alternative donor/stem cell source selection. We assessed HLA-mismatched locus-specific comparison of the outcomes of 351 single-unit UCB and 1,028 unrelated bone marrow (UBM) adult recipients 16 years old or older at the time of transplantation who received first stem cell transplantation with myeloablative conditioning for acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. With adjusted analyses, HLA 0 to 2 mismatched UCBT showed similar overall mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.06; P = .149) compared with that of single-HLA-DRBI-mismatched UBMT. UCBT showed inferior neutrophil recovery (RR = 0.50, 95% CI, 0.42-0.60; P < .001), lower risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (RR = 0.55, 95% CI, 0.42-0.72; P < .001), and lower risk of transplantation-related mortality (RR = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.50-0.92; P = .011) compared with single-HLA-DRBI-mismatched UBMT. No significant difference was observed for risk of relapse (RR = 1.28, 95% CI, 0.93-1.76; P = .125). HLA 0 to 2 antigen-mismatched UCBT is a reasonable second alternative donor/stem cell source with a survival outcome similar to that of single-HLA-DRBI-mismatched or other 7 of 8 UBMT. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 18: 780-787 (2012) (C) 2012 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据