4.5 Article

Retinoic acid-mediated enhancement of the cholinergic/neuronal nitric oxide synthase phenotype of the medial septal SN56 clone: Establishment of a nitric oxide-sensitive proapoptotic state

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 74, 期 6, 页码 2412-2424

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0742412.x

关键词

acetylcholine; apoptosis; free radical; mRNA; oxidative stress; nitric oxide

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG09973, R01 AG12653] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is unclear what mechanisms lead to the degeneration of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer's or other human brain diseases. Some brain cholinergic neurons express neuronal nitric oxide (NO) synthase (nNOS), which produces a free radical that has been implicated in some forms of neurodegeneration. We investigated nNOS expression and NO toxicity in SN56 cells, a clonal cholinergic model derived from the medial septum of the mouse basal forebrain. We show here that, in addition to expressing choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), SN56 cells express nNOS. Treatment of SN56 cells with retinoic acid (RA; 1 mu M) for 48 h increased ChAT mRNA (+126%), protein (+88%), and activity (+215%) and increased nNOS mRNA (+98%), protein (+400%), and activity (+15%). After RA treatment, SN56 cells became vulnerable to NO excess generated with S-nitro-N-acetyl-DL-penicillamine (SNAP) and exhibited increased nuclear DNA fragmentation that was blocked with a caspase-3 inhibitor. Treatment with dexamethasane, which largely blocked the RA-mediated increase in nNOS expression. or inhibition of nNOS activity with methylthiocitrulline strongly potentiated the apoptotic response to SNAP in RA-treated SN56 cells. Caspase-3 activity was reduced when SNAP was incubated with cells or cell lysates, suggesting that NO can directly inhibit the protease. Thus, whereas RA treatment converts SN56 cells to a proapoptotic state sensitive to NO excess, endogenously produced NO appears to be anti-apoptotic, possibly by tonically inhibiting caspase-3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据