4.2 Article

Short-term weight gain in abstaining women smokers

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 339-342

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-5472(99)00085-9

关键词

weight gain; cigarette smoking; cotinine; women; menstrual phase

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA42730] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL52981] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although most studies of weight gain following smoking cessation assess long-term change, weight gain during the critical period immediately following cessation may be more salient to the smoker for whom fear of weight gain constitutes a serious barrier to cessation. The current study examined weight change in 20 highly dependent women smokers provided with monetary incentives to abstain for 1 week. along with concomitant changes in cotinine. Abstaining smokers (n = 7) gained 3.1 pounds, compared with 0.3 pounds in women who continued to smoke (n = 13). Across all subjects, change was significantly negatively correlated with final plasma cotinine concentration and marginally negatively correlated with percent cotinine reduction. Weight gain in women abstainers in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle exceeded that in women abstainers in the follicular phase; a significant interaction such that continuing smokers showed no phase-related differences in weight suggests that the effect was not an artifact of perimenstrual increases in eating or fluid retention. Although long-term weight gain has been shown to be positively associated with success in quitting, little is known about the effects of short-term weight gain. Since many weight-concerned individuals either do not attempt to quit or terminate their quit at tempts very early it may be that if weight gain can be postponed beyond the first few fragile days of cessation, women with strong weight concerns may actually be good candidates for success. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据