4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Regulation of fermentative capacity and levels of glycolytic enzymes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

期刊

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 26, 期 9-10, 页码 724-736

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00164-2

关键词

fermentative capacity; alcoholic fermentation; bakers' yeast; chemostat cultures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulation of fermentative capacity was studied in chemostat cultures of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: the laboratory strain CEN.PK113-7D and the industrial bakers' yeast strain DS28911. The two strains were cultivated at a fixed dilution rate of 0.10 h(-1) under various nutrient limitation regimes: aerobic and anaerobic glucose limitation, aerobic and anaerobic nitrogen limitation on glucose, and aerobic ethanol limitation. Also the effect of specific growth rate on fermentative capacity was compared in glucose-limited, aerobic cultures grown at dilution rates between 0.05 h(-1) and 0.40 h(-1). Biomass yields and metabolite formation patterns were identical for the two strains under all cultivation conditions tested. However, the way in which environmental conditions affected fermentative capacity (assayed off-line as ethanol production rate under anaerobic conditions) differed for the two strains. A different regulation of fermentative capacity in the two strains was also evident from the levels of the glycolytic enzymes, as determined by in vitro enzyme assays. With the exception of phosphofructokinase and pyruvate decarboxylase in the industrial strain, no clear-cut correlation between the activities of glycolytic enzymes and the fermentative capacity was found. These results emphasise the need fur controlled cultivation conditions in studies on metabolic regulation in S. cerevisiae and demonstrate that conclusions from physiological studies cannot necessarily he extrapolated from one S. cerevisiae strain to the other. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据