4.2 Article

Neuropotency of human mesenchymal stem cell cultures: Clonal studies reveal the contribution of cell plasticity and cell contamination

期刊

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 546-555

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.02.017

关键词

mesenchymal stem cells; multipotent stromal cells; neuropotency; pluripotency; transdifferentiation; neural cell plasticity; neural cell contamination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various studies have shown neuropotency of bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) based on the appearance of cells with neural phenotype before or after neural induction protocols. However, to date, it is unclear which mechanisms account for this observation. We hypothesized that neural phenotypes observed in hMSC cultures can be because of both intrinsic cell plasticity and contamination by cells of neural origin. Therefore, we characterized 38 clones from hMSC cultures by assessing their adipogenic/osteogenic potential with specific mesenchymal differentiation protocols, and their molecular neural phenotype by RTPCR analysis before and after exposure to a defined neural stem cell (NSC) medium for 8 days (neural protocol). We found 33 clones with mesenchymal potential and 15 of them also showed a neural phenotype. As neural phenotypes were maintained during the neural protocol, this suggested neural cell plasticity in 39% of all clones through pluripotency. Importantly, we were able to induce neural phenotypes in 11 of mesenchymal clones applying the neural protocol, demonstrating neural cell plasticity in 29% of all clones through the mechanism of transdifferentiation. Finally, 2 of 5 nonmesenchymal clones (5% of all clones) displayed a neural phenotype indicating neural cell contamination of hMSC cultures. In conclusion, we found 2 different ways of neuropotency of hMSC cultures: cell plasticity and cell contamination. (C) 2008 American Sociery for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据