4.5 Article

Developmental stress predicts social network position

期刊

BIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0561

关键词

corticosterone; development; foraging; social network; stress; zebra finch

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Rubicon
  2. NSF [NSF-IOS1250895]
  3. BBSRC [BB/L006081/1]
  4. BBSRC David Phillips Research Fellowship
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1250895] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E024459/1, BB/L006081/1, BB/E024459/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. BBSRC [BB/L006081/1, BB/E024459/1, BB/E024459/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quantity and quality of social relationships, as captured by social network analysis, can have major fitness consequences. Various studies have shown that individual differences in social behaviour can be due to variation in exposure to developmental stress. However, whether these developmental differences translate to consistent differences in social network position is not known. We experimentally increased levels of the avian stress hormone corticosterone (CORT) in nestling zebra finches in a fully balanced design. Upon reaching nutritional independence, we released chicks and their families into two free-flying rooms, where we measured daily social networks over five weeks using passive integrated transponder tags. Developmental stress had a significant effect on social behaviour: despite having similar foraging patterns, CORT chicks had weaker associations to their parents than control chicks. Instead, CORT chicks foraged with a greater number of flock mates and were less choosy with whom they foraged, resulting in more central network positions. These findings highlight the importance of taking developmental history into account to understand the drivers of social organization in gregarious species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据