4.4 Article

Dopamine inhibits melatonin release in the mammalian retina: in vitro evidence

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 286, 期 2, 页码 119-122

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01117-4

关键词

hamster; retina; melatonin; dopamine; dopamine receptors

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [S11NS38483-01, U54NS34194-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A circadian oscillator located within the retina controls melatonin synthesis in the retina of mammals. In non-mammalian vertebrates retinal melatonin and dopamine appear to act as mutually inhibitory paracrine signals for night and day, respectively; while in mammals this mutually inhibitory capability has now been fully demonstrated. In this study using a flow-through culture apparatus we investigated melatonin release from cultured retinas of golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) in the presence of dopamine or dopaminergic agonists and antagonists. Neural retinas were cultured with medium 199 for 24 h in a flow-through apparatus at the temperature 33 degrees C, During the subjective night the culturing medium was supplemented with dopamine, dopamine receptor antagonists or agonists. At the concentration of 0.1 mu M dopamine did not inhibit melatonin release, while at higher dopamine concentration (1 to 1000 mu M) melatonin release was inhibited in a dose-dependant manner. These effects appeared to be mediated by a D-2/D-4 receptor, because D-2 and D-4 receptor agonists (100 mu M), but not D-1/D-5 receptor agonists (100 mu M), inhibited melatonin release. Furthermore, D-2/D-4 selective receptor antagonists (100 mu M) in conjunction with 100 mu M dopamine blocked melatonin suppression, whereas a D-1/D-5 selective receptors antagonist was completely ineffective. Taken together, these results directly demonstrate for the first time that in the retina of mammals dopamine may suppress melatonin, and that suppression is mediated by D-2/D-4 dopaminergic receptors. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据